Skip to main content
· 3/4/2003

In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Lit.

Citations

  • 251 F. Supp. 2d 77
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3488
  • 2003 WL 1089309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that vague and indefinite terms are insufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel
  • dismissing breach of contract claim where plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts demonstrating the existence of a contract
  • “[Plaintiffs’ financial losses most likely occurred where they lived, though this is not specifically alleged in the complaint.”
  • “[If there is no] contract, no claims requiring inducement to enter [a] contract can exist.”
  • “[A] fraud claim requires a showing that (1) the defendant made a false representation, (2) the representation was in reference to a material fact, (3) the defendant had knowledge of its falsity, (4) the defendant intended to deceive, (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.