In Re U.S. Aggregates, Inc. Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to strike all pre-class period allegations as 6 “impertinent and immaterial” because such allegations were “material to [the plaintiff’s] 7 contention that [the defendants] knew the statements made during the class period were 8 false”
• even an obvious failure to follow GAAP does not establish intentional or knowing misconduct
• “Plaintiff can point to no particularized allegation refuting the reasonable assumption that [defendant’s employee] was fired simply because the errors that [led] to the restatement occurred on his watch or because he failed adequately to supervise his department”
• “Plaintiff can point to no partic- ularized allegation refuting the reasonable assumption that [defendant’s employee] was fired simply because the errors that lead to the restatement occurred on his watch or because he failed adequately to supervise his department.”
• “Plaintiff can point to no partic- ularized allegation refuting the reasonable assumption that [defendant’s employee] was fired simply because the errors that lead to the restatement occurred on his watch or because he failed adequately to supervise his department.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).