Skip to main content
· 3/11/2005

Federal Case

Citations

  • 401 F.3d 236
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4131
  • 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining the standing requirement: “that the appellant show that he has been directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by the bankruptcy order”
  • “[D]efining standing by whether an appellant has objected to an order or attended a hearing conflates basic notions of standing with notions of waiver and forfeiture.”
  • attendance and objection are not requirements for standing to appeal a bankruptcy court order
  • “[I]t is not the responsibility of the district court . . . to predict the res judicata effect of its orders on a hypothetical future case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.