· 3/11/2005
Federal Case
Citations
- 401 F.3d 236
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4131
- 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining the standing requirement: “that the appellant show that he has been directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by the bankruptcy order”
- “[D]efining standing by whether an appellant has objected to an order or attended a hearing conflates basic notions of standing with notions of waiver and forfeiture.”
- attendance and objection are not requirements for standing to appeal a bankruptcy court order
- “[I]t is not the responsibility of the district court . . . to predict the res judicata effect of its orders on a hypothetical future case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.