In Re Upton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using schedules I and J to determine projected disposable income, but subtracting from that calculation certain income specifically excluded from the calculation of current monthly income in § 101(10A)
• stating that “if a debtor’s Schedules I and J indicate the net monthly income after excluding any [Social Security income] is less than the proposed plan payment, the [Social Security income] may still be considered by the Court under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(6
• “taking a plain meaning approach which results in strict adherence to Form B22C would be contrary to the structure and purpose of the Bankruptcy Code as a whole and would lead to absurd results”
• “Consideration of benefits received under the Social Security Act is inappropriate for determining ‘projected disposable income.’ ”
• consideration of benefits received under the Social Security Act is inappropriate for determining projected disposable income
• a debtor’s SSI should not be considered when determining whether she has contributed all of her PDI

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).