In Re United States for an Order Authorizing Interception of Oral Communications & Videotape Surveillance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• most observers would regard video surveillance, standing alone, as even more intrusive than interception of oral communications
• combination of videotape and audio surveillance described as “extraordinarily intrusive”
• combination of videotape and audio surveillance described as \extraordinarily intrusive\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).