In re United States Attorney for Orders Pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control & Safe Streets Act of 1968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that strip-club dancers were employees because the club set the cover charge and the price charged per dance
• holding that strip club's exhaustive list of work rules, coupled with fines for non-compliance, indicated that dancers were employees
• concluding that the fact that the strip club did not require dancers to have prior experience points to employee status
• stating that in both inquiries “it is not significant ... how the worker identified herself on tax forms”
• explaining that many employees “are free to carry second jobs[,] [and] [l]ack of fringe benefits or payroll inclusion is likewise unimportant.”
• explaining that the Second Circuit adopts an “economic realities” test to determine whether an individual worker is an employee for purposes of the FLSA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).