Skip to main content
· 5/8/1972

In re United Network, Inc.

Citations

  • 459 F.2d 556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In the present case, Defendant has failed to even acknowledge the interlocutory nature of his appeal, much less argue that some substantial right of his will be affected absent immediate appeal. Defendant cannot argue that this interlocutory appeal is properly before us pursuant to Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murrah

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.