In Re Union Meeting Partners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that third party releases are only permissible where those creditors who vote for the plan have also specifically consented to the releases
• Lincoln properly included the Hansens’ claim in the class of unsecured creditors in its competing plan
• “‘[I]mpairment’ is a term of art and includes virtually any alteration of a claimant’s rights . . . even where a creditor’s rights are improved by a plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).