Skip to main content
· 7/13/1989

In Re Union Carbide Corp. Consumer Products Business Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 718 F. Supp. 1099
  • 1989 WL 85950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the Second Circuit “has held that a settlement can be approved even though the benefits amount to a small percentage of the recovery sought” and emphasizing “[t]he essence of settlement is compromise”
  • “The Court of Appeals has held that a settlement can be approved even though the benefits amount to a small percentage of the recovery sought. The essence of settlement is compromise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brieant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.