Skip to main content
· 10/24/1989

In Re Union Carbide Consumer Prod. Bus. SEC. Lit.

Citations

  • 724 F. Supp. 160
  • 1989 WL 126451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that multipliers “often seem to take on the character of so much Mumbo Jumbo”
  • “[Cjontingent fee risk is the single most important factor in awarding a multiplier”
  • using a multiplier of 2.3 for some counsel and 1.5 for other counsel
  • lodestar multiplier of 2.3 for the steering committee and multiplier of 1.5 for other counsel
  • 27% fee from recovery of $20.2 million
  • 20% fee from recovery of $21.5 million

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brieant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.