Skip to main content
· 12/9/2019

In re Uncapher

Citations

  • 140 S. Ct. 622
  • 205 L. Ed. 2d 410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[O]nly if a regulation is genuinely ambiguous should Auer deference be applied. . . . To determine whether ambiguity exists, courts first must exhaust all the traditional tools of construction.” (internal citation and quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.