In Re UATP Management, LLC D/B/A Urban Air Adventure Park and UA 1604, LLC D/B/A Urban Air v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting on the phrase “final and binding” with the seemingly express agreement required by section 9
• explicit agreement to be bound by arbitration was not required but could be inferred by reference to rules which do provide for binding arbitration
• award “clearly erroneous both in logic and result” but “not irrationally so.”
• “One purpose of [FAA § 9] is to ensure that the parties have affirmatively agreed to the application of the federal substantive law contemplated by the Act to the interpretation of the arbitration agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).