In re Tyco International, Ltd. Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 1335)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overruling objection that a request was better directed to another defendant as it was not an answer permitted by Rule 36
• “If plaintiffs are speculating that documents responsive to these requests do exist, there must be a reasonable deduction that that is true, and not a mere hunch.”
• “Lack of evidence showing that a producing party is in fact in possession of a document is grounds to deny a motion to compel.”
• “Lack of evidence showing that producing party is in fact in possession of a document is grounds to deny a motion to compel.”
• “Lack of evidence showing that producing party is in fact in possession of a document is grounds to deny a motion to compel.”
• “Lack of evidence showing that producing party is in fact in possession of a document is grounds to deny a motion to compel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).