In re T.W.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3037
Syllabus
Stipulation of evidence authentication manifest weight of evidence serious youth offender disposition. The juvenile court did not err in admitting Instagram records in this case where the record reflects that T.W.'s trial counsel stipulated to those records. Further, the findings of guilt entered by the juvenile court were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where there was evidence that the juvenile participated in planning the robbery and further admitted to being in one of the stolen cars. The juvenile court did not err by imposing an SYO sentence simply because it had retained jurisdiction of cases by finding the juvenile to be amenable to the juvenile justice system.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-04· cited 702×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-09-26· cited 585×
- State v. D.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-01-08· cited 68×
- State v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court· 2005-05-11· cited 62×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-02· cited 31×
- State v. CappOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-28· cited 28×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-07· cited 16×
- State v. CrosbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-20· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.