In Re TW

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that payment for installation of security lights did not fall within the statutory provision allowing restitution “ ‘for out-of-pocket expenses, damages, losses, or injuries’ sustained by victims of a crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rich v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-07-16· cited 143×
• People v. Fitzgerald
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-05· cited 4×
• A.J.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-27

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. T.W.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-08-23· cited 11×
• People v. D.R.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-19· cited 10×