In Re Turpen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a debtor’s plan is not con-firmable when it proposes to fund payments with the proceeds of a speculative liquidation of “so many of the debtor’s nonexempt assets as is necessary to pay allowed unsecured claims in full.”
• debtor must object to standing prior to hearing on confirmation so that the creditor is prepared to put on some evidence of its status
• “When as in this district, a confirmation hearing is held prior to a claims deadline, the filing of a claim is not required for a creditor to object to a Chapter 13 plan.”
• “Debtors provide [Markman ] as support for their proposal to make payments of a fixed amount over less than three years. Markman does not aid debtors because it was decided before the disposable income requirement was added to Chapter 13 in 1984.”
• “Debtors provide [Markman] as support for their proposal to make payments of a fixed amount over less than three years. Markman does not aid debtors because it was decided before the disposable income requirement was added to Chapter 13 in 1984.”
• “Debtors provide [Markman] as support for their proposal to make payments of a fixed amount over less than three years. Markman does not aid debtors because it was decided before the disposable income requirement was added to Chapter 13 in 1984.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).