In re Turner
Citations
- 94 Kan. 115
- 145 P. 871
- 1915 Kan. LEXIS 54
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>L. Habeas Corpus — Delinquent and Incorrigible Girl — Committed to Industrial School for Girls — Proceeding of Juvenile Court — Regular and Valid. A girl fifteen years old found by the probate judge, sitting as the juvenile court, to be de-. linquent and incorrigible, to associate knowingly with immoral persons, to be growing up in idleness and crime and violating the city ordinances by remaining out until late hours at night, was ordered committed to the Industrial School for Girls at Beloit. Her parents appeared without service of process on them, but the child was taken into custody by the probation officer upon a warrant based upon a complaint verified on information and belief. A hearing followed, and the testimony abundantly supported the findings of the court. Held, that such child is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus because of failure to verify the complaint positively.</p> <p>2. Same — Purpose of the Juvenile Court. The juvenile court act (Gen. Stat. 1909, §§ 5099-5113) has for its object not the punishment of juvenile offenders for misconduct, criminal or otherwise, but their removal from the path of temptation and their direction into the paths of rectitude by preventive and corrective means.</p> <p>3. Same. The act is an assertion of the state’s power as parens patriae and its right to exercise proper parental control over those of its minor citizens who are disposed to go wrong.</p> <p>4. Same — No Constitutional Rights Invaded. In the charge, apprehension, investigation and order involved herein, the child was not denied any of her constitutional rights.</p> <p>5. Same — No Stigma Attaches by Commitment to the Industrial School for Girls. By express declaration of the statute in question, and by the settled decisions applicable to similar enactments, all such proceedings, orders and judgments are deemed to have been taken and done in the exercise of the state’s parental power, and neither the stigma nor the penal
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pee v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1959-06-25· cited 100×
- Thomas v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1941-06-02· cited 80×
- In Re SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1943-04-13· cited 73×
- State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-06-28· cited 46×
- State Ex Rel. Minot v. GronnaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1953-06-05· cited 43×
- In Re KeddyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-06-29· cited 41×
- In re HookSupreme Court of Vermont· 1922-01-05· cited 40×
- Findlay v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-04-27· cited 32×
- State Ex Rel. O'Sullivan v. Heart Ministries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1980-03-01· cited 29×
- Lennon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1964-11-07· cited 28×
- Hardesty v. HardestySupreme Court of Kansas· 1939-07-08· cited 25×
- State v. O'KeithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-11-05· cited 16×
- State v. FountaineSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-05-07· cited 15×
- D.B.S. v. M.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-01-27· cited 15×
- Overholser v. TreiblyD.C. Circuit· 1945-02-20· cited 14×
- J. L. v. ParhamM.D. Georgia· 1976-02-26· cited 13×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1959-06-25· cited 11×
- Richardson v. BrowningD.C. Circuit· 1927-04-04· cited 10×
- In re HosfordSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-06-05· cited 10×
- Trent v. BellamySupreme Court of Kansas· 1948-03-06· cited 9×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-10-09· cited 106×
- Fontain v. RavenelSupreme Court· 1855-01-18· cited 91×
- In re a Writ of Habeas Corpus for SharpIdaho Supreme Court· 1908-06-20· cited 71×
- Lindsay v. LindsayIllinois Supreme Court· 1913-02-20· cited 71×
- Ex parte JanuszewskiU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio· 1911-12-04· cited 49×
- Pugh v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 19×
- Hunt v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court· 1905-12-04· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.