In Re Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Chapter 13 plan providing a 29 percent payment to unsecured creditors and 100 percent to student loan creditors did not discriminate unfairly because the unsecured creditors would receive nothing if debtors’ case were converted, to a Chapter 7

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bentley v. Boyajian (In Re Bentley)
  First Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 63×
• In Re Williams
  W.D. Tennessee· 2000-07-27· cited 28×
• In re Engen
  D. Kansas· 2016-12-13· cited 12×
• In Re Willis
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1995-12-05· cited 7×
• In Re Bernal
  S.D. California· 1995-11-14· cited 4×
• Matter of Smith
  N.D. Indiana· 1998-05-29· cited 2×