Customs and Patent Appeals· 1/4/1932
In Re Tucker
Citations
- 54 F.2d 815
- 19 C.C.P.A. 810
Judges: Graham, Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, Lenroot
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re WagenhorstCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1933-04-24· cited 23×
- Application of Lepage's Incorporated (A Subsidiary of the Papercraft Corporation, and Assignee of Johnson & Johnson)Customs and Patent Appeals· 1963-01-16· cited 19×
- Fageol v. MidboeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1932-04-06· cited 9×
- Application of Homer G. ThomsonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1964-11-05· cited 7×
- Application of BeltzCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1950-04-03· cited 2×
- Application of WilliamsCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1951-04-10· cited 2×
- In re RingelCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1938-02-07· cited 1×
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-07-26
- In re SchwarzCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1941-02-24
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smart v. WrightEighth Circuit· 1915-09-07· cited 20×
- Dean v. DavisFourth Circuit· 1914-02-11· cited 11×
- In re TuckerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-01-21· cited 6×
- Evans v. Suess Ornamental Glass Co.Seventh Circuit· 1897-11-08· cited 6×
- In re BurnelliCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1930-03-19· cited 5×
- Arnold v. BishopDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1841-11-15· cited 3×
- In re AikenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1850-07-01· cited 1×
- Burlew v. O'NeilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1853-03-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.