In Re Tsoutsouris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[i]n their professional capacity, lawyers are expected to provide emotionally detached, objective analysis of legal problems and issues for clients who may be embroiled in sensitive or difficult matters’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Huber v. Taylor
  Third Circuit· 2006-10-31· cited 118×
• In re Robert Lee Vogel, BPR 023374
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2016-02-04· cited 22×
• In Re Hefron
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-07-29· cited 7×
• In Re Pacior
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 1×
• Huber v. Taylor, II
  Third Circuit· 2006-10-31
• Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Zelotes
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-08-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Smith
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 30×
• In the Matter of Wood
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-12-23· cited 26×
• Brown v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-05-26· cited 21×
• Shady v. Shady
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-12-11· cited 21×
• Matter of Grimm
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 19×
• Matter of Wood
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-03-20· cited 10×
• In Re Cherry
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 6×
• Matter of Hawkins
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 2×
• In Re Bamberth
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-11-08· cited 2×