In re T.S.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2034
Syllabus
Parental rights permanent custody totality of the circumstances COVID-19 continuance. Evidence supported juvenile court's termination of father's parental rights where evidence showed father did not become involved in case until several months after his daughter was taken into custody, and where once involved, he did not obtain or maintain a stable residence for the child, and he failed to complete case plan objectives to address substance abuse issues. Additionally, where father did not request a continuance due to COVID-19 and raises the issue for the first time on appeal, absent plain error, the juvenile court cannot be found to have erred in not continuing the case.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,335×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court· 1991-08-07· cited 216×
- In re HoffmanOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-23· cited 194×
- Lansdowne v. Beacon Journal Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 147×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 61×
- In re J.M-R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-18· cited 28×
- In re K.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-11· cited 14×
- State v. GeigerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-01· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.