Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 6/11/2009
In Re Trever I.
Citations
- 2009 ME 59
- 973 A.2d 752
- 2009 Me. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the party asserting the applicability of the ICWA has the burden to provide sufficient information to at least put the court or Department on notice that the child may be an ‘Indian child,’ within the meaning of the ICWA, and that further inquiry is necessary”
- child welfare agency properly investigated father’s vague claim of Indian heritage by notifying BIA of supporting information
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saufley, Clifford, Alexander, Levy, Silver, Mead
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re A.M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-10-23· cited 73×
- Jocelyn Lee Geouge v. Jason Barry Traylor, Dustin Griffith and Tiffany Vadella-GriffithCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2017-12-27· cited 72×
- J.J. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-11-25· cited 27×
- Androkites v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-12-21· cited 26×
- In re Child of Radience K.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-05-21· cited 17×
- State of Maine v. Reginald DubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2014-03-18· cited 13×
- In re Cain Keel L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-11-18· cited 12×
- Huda D. Daud v. Badal H. AbdullahiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2015-05-05· cited 9×
- In re Child of Mercedes D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2018-11-13· cited 9×
- In re T.B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-05-23· cited 8×
- In re J.B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2015-03-10· cited 7×
- In re F.O.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-01-13· cited 5×
- In re T.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-04-04· cited 5×
- Pollard v. CrowghostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-01-25· cited 5×
- In re S.P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-09-24· cited 4×
- People in interest of I.B.-RColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 4×
- Jeanette J. v. Administration for Children's ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-06-22· cited 3×
- In re Children of Michelle C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2021-12-07· cited 2×
- in the Interest of C. T. and K. T., Minor ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2012-12-27
- In re Child of Nicholas M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2018-03-06
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
- People v. Diane N.Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-05-24· cited 433×
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power LaboratorySupreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 194×
- United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 129×
- B.H. v. People ex rel. X.H.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2006-06-26· cited 52×
- Dowley v. MorencySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-09-27· cited 49×
- Sheboygan County Department of Human Services v. Neal J.G.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 37×
- In Re CNIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-05-24· cited 34×
- State v. ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-08-01· cited 21×
- In the Matter of Adoption of CdNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 16×
- In Re Denice F.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-05-24· cited 16×
- In Re AL and JLNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-03-20· cited 12×
- State v. K.M.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-02-09· cited 12×
- In Re Frederick P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-09-28· cited 8×
- Wright & Mills v. BisphamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-07-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.