In re Treetop Development Company Act 250 Development (Treetop at Stratton Condominium Assn., Inc., Appellant)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it was the pro se incarcerated plaintiff’s “responsibility to appoint a screening panel member”
• discussing the district court’s order dismissing screening panel proceedings after, among other things, the pro se incarcerated plaintiff failed to designate a screening panel member
• discussing the district court’s reasoning for dismissing screening panel proceedings, which included that many of the pro se incarcerated plaintiff’s allegations were not related to medical negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).