In re: Travis M. Hamlin and Brittany B. Hamlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that with the enactment of BAPCPA, debtors in opt-out states like Arizona are not limited to the state law IRA exemption but may, independent of such law, claim the exemption under 522(b)(3)(C)
• stating that with the enactment of BAPCPA, debtors in opt-out states like Arizona are not limited to the state law IRA exemption but may, independent of such law, claim the exemption under 522(b)(3)(C)
• finding that a debtor in an opt- state is not limited to the IRA exemptions provided by that state, but may claim the applicable federal exemption, subject to the limitation in § 522(n)
• stating that debtors in opt-out states may claim the § 522(b)(3)(C) exemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).