In Re Trans Texas Holdings Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Patent Office is not bound by district court claim construction because Patent Office was not a party to the district court proceeding
• holding that defendant “waived its delegation clause argument when it waited to raise the issue until after it had asked the district court to decide arbitrability”
• noting that, for res judicata, “the presumption that nonparties are not bound by a judgment can only be rebutted in limited circumstances.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• \We conclude that the Board was not bound by the district court's claim construction ....\
• “We conclude that the Board was not bound by the district court’s claim construction . . . .”
• “[T]he Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not apply to the government[.]” (citing South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301, 323–24 (1966

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).