In re Trans-Pacific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• timing factor weighs against stay when, although little discovery had occurred, trial date was twelve months away and court had expended substantial effort construing the claims
• timing factor weighs against stay when, although little discovery had occurred, trial date was twelve months away and court had expended substantial effort construing the claims
• “[infringement among competitors can cause harm in the marketplace that is not compensable by readily calculable money damages.”
• finding “[t]he fact that Plaintiff did not seek a preliminary injunction does not 28 mean that it would not suffer prejudicial harm from its competitor’s market activity during 1 a lengthy delay in the case”
• “The Court’s expenditure of resources is an important factor in evaluating the stage of the proceedings.”
• “The 16 Court’s expenditure of resources is an important factor in evaluating the stage of the 17 proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).