In re Trammell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that not granting retroactive stay relief would unduly prejudice the IRS because the debtor’s MLB disability pension benefits would flow back to the debtor and the funds would likely be lost forever
• “[A] one-time levy may seize a future stream of payments if the taxpayer’s right to the payments is fixed and determinable without any requirement for the provision of future services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2004-06-03· cited 37×
• Wilmington Trust Co. v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)
  S.D. New York· 2013-04-03· cited 37×
• In Re Printup
  E.D. Tennessee· 2001-05-23· cited 32×
• In Re Olick
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-05-29· cited 20×
• In Re Elder-Beerman Stores Corp.
  S.D. Ohio· 1996-05-03· cited 13×
• In Re Burrell
  E.D. Tennessee· 1995-08-28· cited 10×
• In Re Rogers
  E.D. Texas· 1999-10-14· cited 8×
• In Re Bushee
  E.D. Tennessee· 2004-12-22· cited 6×
• In re Benchmark Capital, Inc.
  E.D. Tennessee· 2013-04-09· cited 3×
• In re Shivshankar Partnership LLC
  E.D. Tennessee· 2014-09-19· cited 3×
• Mooney v. Gill
  N.D. Texas· 2002-03-26· cited 2×
• Bowers v. United States
  C.D. Illinois· 2012-05-22· cited 1×