Skip to main content

In re T.R.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2531

Syllabus

Parental rights; permanent custody; manifest weight of the evidence; sufficiency of the evidence; plain error; no objection to the magistrate's decision; no transcript; R.C. 2151.414(B)(1); child could not or should not be placed with either parent within a reasonable time; R.C. 2151.414(D)(2); best interest of the child; motion for continuance; App.R. 12(A)(2), App.R. 16(A)(7). This court found no plain error when the juvenile court found clear and convincing evidence to support its finding that at least one of the conditions set forth in R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a) through (e) applied and that it was in the best interest of the child to grant permanent custody to the agency. Absent citations to authorities, statutes, or the record, this court declined to address Mother's assignment of error that alleged the trial court abused its discretion when it denied her request to continue the trial date.

Judges: Forbes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.