In Re Torres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “By its own terms, [§ 1325(b)(1)(B)] is not invoked unless an objection to confirmation is made by one statutorily authorized to do so (the Trustee or an unsecured creditor with an allowed claim).”
• the general principle, that a confirmed plan is res judicata as to all justiciable issues that were or could have been determined at confirmation, is subject to the limitation that the plan must suggest a basis on which to object to the confirmation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Storey v. Pees (In Re Storey)
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 31×
• In re Martin
  C.D. Illinois· 2012-01-24· cited 4×
• In re Ferrouillat
  S.D. Alabama· 2016-10-24· cited 2×
• In re: Tony Storey v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-08-07
• Hampton v. Bank of LaFayette
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-02-14
• In re Ferrouillat
  S.D. Alabama· 2016-04-21

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Dorothy Thelma Alexander, Debtor. Ronald R. Benevides and Karole L. Benevides v. Dorothy Thelma Alexander
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-03-04· cited 107×
• Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Warren (In Re Warren)
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-08-16· cited 106×
• Anaheim Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Evans (In Re Evans)
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-05-06· cited 85×
• In Re Jones
  D. Minnesota· 1985-11-05· cited 58×
• In Re Charlene Wise HARLAN, Debtor. WESTERN EQUITIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charlene Wise HARLAN, Defendant-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-02-19· cited 29×
• Matter of Davis
  S.D. Ohio· 1986-12-02· cited 21×
• In Re Tracey
  D. Maryland· 1986-10-17· cited 16×
• Smith v. ITT Financial Services (In Re Smith)
  S.D. Indiana· 1989-05-05· cited 9×