In Re Toft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the mere fact that U.S. law differs from the law of the foreign main proceeding does not preclude enforcement as “manifestly contrary” to U.S. public policy
• “the few reported cases that have analyzed [section] 1506 at length recognize that it is to be applied sparingly”
• “[T]hose courts that have considered the public policy exception codified in [section] 1506 have uniformly read it narrowly and applied it sparingly.”
• “[T]hose courts that have considered the public policy exception codified in [section] 1506 have uniformly read it narrowly and applied it sparingly.”
• “The public policy exception is clearly drafted in narrow terms, as the action must be ‘manifestly contrary’ to the public policy of the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).