· 1/17/1995
In Re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation
Citations
- 872 F. Supp. 1019
- 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 774
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 601
- 1995 WL 16766
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that DuPont would be entitled to summary judgment under the bulk supplier doctrine in at least Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin
- finding that the anticipated type of use might dictate different levels of warnings
- suggesting remand of cases that no longer 11 benefited from consolidated pretrial proceedings
- suggesting remand of 16 cases that no longer benefited from consolidated pretrial proceedings
- suggesting remand of 16 cases that no longer benefited from consolidated pretrial proceedings
- suggesting remand of 16 cases that no longer benefited from consolidated pretrial proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Magnuson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.