In Re Tmi. Metropolitan Edison Company (\Met Ed\) Pennsylvania Electric Company Jersey Central Power & Light Company General Public Utilities Corp. Babcock & Wilcox Co. McDermott Inc. Dresser Industries, Inc. Ue & C--Catalytic, Inc. (Raytheon) Burns & Roe Enterprises, Nos. 94-7600/7601, and Metro Ed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A construction inconsistent with a statute’s plain meaning ... is justifiable only when clear indications of contrary legislative intent exist”
• unambiguous language of 1988 Act makes clear that Congress did not intend to change Silkwood result
• \A construction inconsistent with a statute's plain meaning ... is justifiable only when clear indications of contrary legislative intent exist\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).