In Re: Tmi Litigation Lori Dolan Joseph Gaughan Ronald Ward Estate of Pearl Hickernell Kenneth Putt Estate of Ethelda Hilt Paula Obercash Jolene Peterson Estate of Gary Villella Estate of Leo Beam, No. 96-7623 in Re: Tmi Litigation All Except Lori Dolan, Joseph Gaughan, Ronald Ward, Estate of Pearl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a District Court properly excluded expert testimony where the sole basis for the testimony was summaries prepared by a party’s attorney
• concluding that expert opinion based on speculation would not assist the trier of fact
• stating that “the standard for determining reliability is not that high, even given the evidentiary gauntlet facing the proponent of expert testimony under Rule 702” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding an expert’s conclusion based upon a logical analysis of 4 the expert’s testimony
• stating that “the standard for determining reliability is not that high, even given the evidentiary gauntlet facing the proponent of expert testimony under Rule 702’
• stating that “the standard for determining reliability is not that high, even given the evidentiary gauntlet facing the proponent of expert testimony under Rule 702” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).