· 2/18/1994
In re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II
Citations
- 904 F. Supp. 379
- 1994 WL 858041
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a “temporal limitation” as “one indicia of particularity”
- upholding warrant where it did not authorize a general, unfettered or indiscriminate search of all computer logs and “records,” but authorized a search and seizure that was limited to evidence of the specific crimes under investigation and a specific time period
- “The use of a taint team is a proper, fair and acceptable method of protecting privileged communications when a search involves property of an attorney.”
- “The use of a taint team is a proper, fair and acceptable method of protecting privileged communications when a search involves property of an attorney.”
- “The use of a taint team is a proper, fair and acceptable method of protecting privileged communications when a search involves property of an attorney.”
- A warrant need only be specific enough for “the executing officer to exercise reasonable, rational and informed discretion and judgement [sic] in selecting what should be seized”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rambo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.