Skip to main content
· 2/18/1994

In re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II

Citations

  • 904 F. Supp. 379
  • 1994 WL 858041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a “temporal limitation” as “one indicia of particularity”
  • upholding warrant where it did not authorize a general, unfettered or indiscriminate search of all computer logs and “records,” but authorized a search and seizure that was limited to evidence of the specific crimes under investigation and a specific time period
  • “The use of a taint team is a proper, fair and acceptable method of protecting privileged communications when a search involves property of an attorney.”
  • “The use of a taint team is a proper, fair and acceptable method of protecting privileged communications when a search involves property of an attorney.”
  • “The use of a taint team is a proper, fair and acceptable method of protecting privileged communications when a search involves property of an attorney.”
  • A warrant need only be specific enough for “the executing officer to exercise reasonable, rational and informed discretion and judgement [sic] in selecting what should be seized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rambo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.