Skip to main content

In Re T.M.

Citations

  • 706 N.E.2d 931
  • 302 Ill. App. 3d 33
  • 236 Ill. Dec. 57
  • 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no jurisdiction under Rule 307(a)(1) and dismissing appeal of decision to modify protective order related to child custody terms as it was not an interlocutory order granting an injunction
  • “Further, an order is final where matters left for future determination are merely incidental to the ultimate rights that have been adjudicated by the order”
  • order not found to be injunctive for purposes of appeal under Rule 307(a)(1) where parties' rights have not been finally decided
  • order not found to be injunctive for purposes of appeal under Rule 307(a)(1) where parties’ rights have not been finally decided
  • trial court’s order modifying prior supervised visitation order allowing father supervised overnight visits with children and stepchildren was not an injunctive order and therefore not immediately appealable under Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1)
  • trial court's order modifying prior supervised visitation order allowing father supervised overnight visits with children and stepchildren was not an injunctive order and therefore not immediately appealable under Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frossard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.