Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/18/2001
In Re TM
Citations
- 628 N.W.2d 570
- 245 Mich. App. 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the notice provisions triggered where the respondent testified that although she was not a member of a tribe, she was of Native American heritage and believed she had Cherokee ancestry
- finding the notice provisions triggered where the respondent testified that although she was not a member of a tribe, she was of Native American heritage and believed she had Cherokee ancestry
- technical failure in method of notice “does not invalidate the proceedings if actual notice was achieved through a comparable method”
- termination supported where the respondent “failed to make any substantial effort to communicate with [the child] or obtain assistance in regaining custody of her for a period well beyond the statutory period”
- “If proper notice is provided and a tribe fails to either respond or intervene in the matter, the burden shifts to the parties (i.e., the parents) to show that the ICWA still applies.”
- “If proper notice is provided and a tribe fails to either respond or intervene in the matter, the burden shifts to the parties . . . to show that [the Indian Child Welfare Act] still applies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bandstra, Wilder, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re MorrisMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-05-04· cited 87×
- Mahaney v. MahaneyWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 60×
- In the Interest of R.E.K.F.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2005-06-10· cited 38×
- In the Interest of K.S., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2014-08-21· cited 29×
- People ex rel. T.M.W.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-04-02· cited 24×
- In the Interest of D.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-07-09· cited 13×
- People v. AmosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-02-15· cited 7×
- In re MorrisMichigan Court of Appeals· 2013-03-21· cited 5×
- In Re TAAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-02-15· cited 4×
- In Re MahaneyWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 4×
- Raena R. v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2012-01-26· cited 4×
- In Re REKFSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-06-10· cited 3×
- In Re SmmdNevada Supreme Court· 2012-01-26· cited 2×
- Fred Lavery Co. v. Nissan North America, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2004-05-04· cited 2×
- in Re J L Gordon MinorMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-05-04
- In the Matter of Kentavious M. (d.o.b. 03/29/2007), A Minor Child Under Eighteen (18) years of ageCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-12-14
- In Re DCCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-07-09
- People Ex Rel. TmwColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-04-02
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Trejo MinorsMichigan Supreme Court· 2000-07-05· cited 668×
- In Re SoursMichigan Supreme Court· 1999-05-25· cited 74×
- In Re ElliottMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-09-27· cited 44×
- In Re IEMMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-03-23· cited 35×
- In Re the Welfare of M.S.S.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-02· cited 29×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. Priscilla S.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-10-12· cited 25×
- McCormick v. McCormickMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-04-29· cited 13×
- In Re ShawbooseMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-01-06· cited 9×
- People Ex Rel. Dss in Interest of ChSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-12-22· cited 8×
- Matter of BJESouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 2×
- Matter of LAMAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-11-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.