In re T.M.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 843
Syllabus
Permanent custody; reasonable efforts; child in the temporary custody of agency for 12 or more months of a consecutive 22-month period; children \cannot or should not\ be returned to parent; parent demonstrated a \lack of commitment\; permanent custody to agency in children's best interest. Judgment affirmed. The record demonstrates that the agency made reasonable efforts to reunite mother with her children and the juvenile court documented those efforts throughout the case. Clear and convincing evidence supported the juvenile court's finding that the children cannot or should not be returned to mother and that mother had a lack of commitment toward the children. The record demonstrates that it was in the best interest of the children to grant the agency's motion for permanent custody.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re Estate of HaynesOhio Supreme Court· 1986-07-23· cited 380×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 80×
- In re M.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 49×
- In re B.B.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-15· cited 12×
- In re I.A.-W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-26· cited 11×
- In re T.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-07· cited 10×
- In re B.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-27· cited 5×
- In re D.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.