District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/3/2010
In re T.L.
Citations
- 996 A.2d 805
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant did not create “breach of the peace” -within the meaning of the statute despite the fact that “some ten to fifteen people left their town houses” in order to observe the “clamor” that defendant caused by yelling loudly on the street
- “This is the first prosecution under subsection (3) of the statute that has come to our attention.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fisher, Glickman, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dormu v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-06-07· cited 95×
- Wesby v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2014-09-02· cited 93×
- Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-08-06· cited 54×
- Huthnance v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2013-07-09· cited 21×
- Wesby v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-01-18· cited 21×
- Roosevelt Whitfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-09-18· cited 21×
- HUTHNANCE v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-07-19· cited 19×
- United States v. DebruhlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-02-23· cited 15×
- Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-08-15· cited 13×
- Egudu v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-10-29· cited 8×
- Kim E. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-12-04· cited 3×
- In Re TlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-06-03
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,428×
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1972-03-23· cited 1,392×
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,207×
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando Lopez-SotoNinth Circuit· 2000-03-08· cited 251×
- United States v. ChanthasouxatEleventh Circuit· 2003-08-22· cited 223×
- Peay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-10· cited 128×
- United States v. Demarco L. McDonaldSeventh Circuit· 2006-07-17· cited 96×
- Norwell v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 92×
- United States v. Danilo Baro (92-1501 93-1250) and Ramon Baro (92-1502 93-1250)Sixth Circuit· 1994-03-21· cited 88×
- George Albert Williams v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1969-06-20· cited 78×
- United States v. CoplinFirst Circuit· 2006-09-20· cited 77×
- United States v. $506,231 in United States CurrencySeventh Circuit· 1997-09-03· cited 77×
- United States v. TibbettsTenth Circuit· 2005-02-02· cited 76×
- Eanes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-08· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.