In Re Thulin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the district court’s finding that the appellant lacked capacity, even though the appellant testified that he rejected neuroleptic medication based on its risks, when a doctor testified that the appellant’s refusal of medication was not rational
• affirming appellant’s civil commitment as mentally ill
• upholding jurisdiction based on similar factors
• addressing continued commitment as mentally ill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).