Skip to main content
· 12/17/1985

In Re the Welfare of W.R.

Citations

  • 379 N.W.2d 544
  • 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding § 1912 provision of \the continued custody of the child by the parent\ does not refer to the physical custody of the child
  • affirming the district court’s termination of appellant-father’s parental rights because he failed to make “minimal efforts that were within his ability, regardless of his poverty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crippen, Wozniak, Lansing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.