Skip to main content
· 4/11/1989

In re the Welfare of R.M.J.

Citations

  • 438 N.W.2d 410
  • 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 425
  • 1989 WL 32632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Md. Rule 2-311(f) did not require a court to hold a requested hearing on the transfer of a case to another jurisdiction because oifoj-um non conveniens
  • affirming transfer from Baltimore City to Montgomery County of claim on uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage by Montgomery County insured where situs of the accident and treatment was Montgomery County
  • We provided that a plaintiffs “allegation about his possible expert is entitled to some weight, but not much.”
  • “Deference to the plaintiffs choice is even further discounted when the forum initially chosen by the plaintiff has no meaningful connection to the suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Lansing, Schumacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.