Skip to main content
· 6/14/1985

In Re the Welfare of P.J.K.

Citations

  • 369 N.W.2d 286
  • 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts may look to a parent’s “actual condition” and not simply “conduct” to determine whether a parent is unfit
  • affirming TPR where father had permanent mental retardation, was combative, children responded negatively toward him, he failed to complete his case plan, he could not hold down a job, and he went missing
  • affirming termination of low-intellect father’s parental rights to his special-needs children when “father could not grasp even the most basic parenting skills” and “[w]hat appearances the father has made in the children’s lives has produced trauma”
  • “[N]owhere in the statute is imminent adoption an element of a termination proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.