In Re the Welfare of J.A.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the testimony of a qualified Indian expert was not required at the initial detention hearing in the case since that hearing was an emergency removal
• noting that 6 “[t]he record shows the guardian ad litem believed it would be best for the children if the detention hearing proceeded as scheduled . . . .”
• certain notice requirements under ICWA inapplicable to emergency custody proceedings or hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).