Skip to main content
· 8/21/1979

In Re the Welfare of Hansen

Citations

  • 599 P.2d 1304
  • 24 Wash. App. 27
  • 1979 Wash. App. LEXIS 2684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that former guardians of children had standing to challenge dependency finding based on possible loss of relationship with children
  • holding that former guardians of children had standing to challenge dependency finding based on possible loss of relationship with children
  • requiring that the trial court determine the best interest of the child on remand
  • recognizing the due process rights of legal guardians, who had raised child for over eight years and stood in loco parentis to the child, to be given a full and meaningful opportunity to be heard at a dependency hearing under Chapter 13.04 RCW
  • recognizing the due process rights of legal guardians, who had raised child for over eight years and stood in loco parentis to the child, to be given a full and meaningful opportunity to be heard at a dependency hearing under chapter 13.04 RCW
  • superior court had authority to proceed with post-divorce custody modification upon express authority of juvenile court to proceed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McInturff, Green, Munson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.