In re the Welfare of BMC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Suits are parallel when substantially the same parties are contemporaneously litigating substantially the same issue in another forum.\ (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• the two claims involved distinctly different facts and applicable law, and thus were not parallel
• the two claims involved distinctly different facts and applicable law, and thus were not parallel
• “[A] finding that the concurrent proceedings are ‘parallel’ is a necessary prerequisite to abstention under Colorado River.”
• “[A] finding that the concurrent proceedings are ‘parallel’ is a necessary prerequisite to abstention under Colorado River.”
• “Suits are parallel when substantially the same parties are contemporaneously litigating substantially the same issue in another forum.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).