In re the Transfer of the Ninth District Municipal Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that no statutory authority exists allowing the appeal of a Criminal Term of County Court’s denial of an unsealing motion
• noting that “a former defendant does not have an absolute right to the disclosure of materials sealed pursuant to [Section] 160.50”
• \The sealing requirement was designed to lessen the adverse consequences of unsuccessful criminal prosecutions by limiting access to official records and papers in criminal proceedings which terminate in favor of the accused\
• “The sealing requirement [of § 160.50(1)] was designed to lessen the adverse consequences of unsuccessful criminal prosecutions by limiting access to official records and papers in criminal proceedings which terminate in favor of the accused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).