In re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of N.C., a minor child, and his Father, C.C. v. The Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• articulating the factors that must be balanced in a sexual-assault case to which Rule 413 applies
• explaining a district court “may consider trial testimony,” in addition to suppression hearing evidence, “if the defendant renews the suppression motion at trial” (quotations omitted)
• “Although not precedential, we find the reasoning of unpublished opinions, including those from other jurisdictions, instructive.” (emphasis added)
• “[A]t most, we have assumed one error for purposes of our analysis: that Agent Willis was permitted to vouch for K.M.’s credibility. Under these circumstances, we reject Mr. Willis’s argument because there are not multiple errors to cumulate.”
• “[A]t most, we have assumed one error for purposes of our analysis: that Agent Willis was permitted to vouch for K.M.’s credibility. Under these circumstances, we reject Mr. Willis’s argument because there are not multiple errors to cumulate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).