Skip to main content
· 6/23/1987

In Re the Termination of Parental Rights With Regard to Samantha D.

Citations

  • 740 P.2d 1168
  • 106 N.M. 184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that parents do not have absolute rights in their children and that, instead, parental rights are secondary to the best interests and welfare of the children
  • any rights parents have to their children are secondary to the best interests and welfare of the child
  • mother who signed an invalid consent to adoption was held responsible for the disintegration of the parent-child relationship
  • “In keeping with the best interests of the child, the trial court retains the power to determine custody in the absence of a legally valid consent, and it was within the authority of the trial court to continue Samantha in the custody of [the foster parents].”
  • best interests of child is paramount consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarid, Minzner, Apodaca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.