In re the Supreme Court Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a prior inconsistent statement of a witness who takes the stand and is subject to cross-examination is admissible as substantive evidence”
• noting that “a 6 prior inconsistent statement of a witness who takes the stand and is subject to cross-examination is admissible as substantive evidence”
• single conviction for armed robbery of apartment although multiple victims present
• single conviction for armed robbery of apartment although multiple victims present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).