· 1/27/1994
In re the Succession of Durabb
Citations
- 631 So. 2d 1324
- 1994 La. App. LEXIS 70
- 1994 WL 20914
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the finding that an attorney presented false, confusing, and deliberately misleading testimony at the disciplinary hearing was a “significant” aggravating factor and that such a finding does not have to be explicitly labeled as such by the referee to be considered
- stating that the finding that an attorney presented false, confusing, and deliberately misleading testimony at the disciplinary hearing was a “significant” aggravating factor and that such a finding does not have to be explicitly labeled as such by the referee to be considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Barry, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.