Skip to main content
· 1/27/1994

In re the Succession of Durabb

Citations

  • 631 So. 2d 1324
  • 1994 La. App. LEXIS 70
  • 1994 WL 20914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the finding that an attorney presented false, confusing, and deliberately misleading testimony at the disciplinary hearing was a “significant” aggravating factor and that such a finding does not have to be explicitly labeled as such by the referee to be considered
  • stating that the finding that an attorney presented false, confusing, and deliberately misleading testimony at the disciplinary hearing was a “significant” aggravating factor and that such a finding does not have to be explicitly labeled as such by the referee to be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Barry, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.